Items where Author is "Liu, Fenrong"

PP-2019-11: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong and Smets, Sonja (2019) Logico-Computational Aspects of Rationality. [Pre-print] (In Press)

PP-2020-14: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2020) New Logical Perspectives on Monotonicity. [Pre-print] (In Press)

PP-2019-03: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2019) Graph Games and Logic Design. [Pre-print] (Submitted)

PP-2015-02: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2015) Deontic Logic and Preference Change. [Report]

PP-2015-07: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2015) Where is Logic Going? [Report]

PP-2012-27: Liu, Fenrong and Seligman, Jeremy and van Benthem, Johan (2012) Models of Reasoning in Ancient China. [Report]

PP-2011-24: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2011) Deontic Logic and Changing Preferences. [Report]

PP-2011-29: van Benthem, Johan and Grossi, Davide and Liu, Fenrong (2011) On the Two Faces of Deontics: Semantic Betterness and Syntactic Priority. [Report]

DS-2008-02: Liu, Fenrong (2008) Changing for the Better: Preference Dynamics and Agent Diversity. Doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam.

PP-2007-26: van Benthem, Johan and Ghosh, Sujata and Liu, Fenrong (2007) Modelling Simultaneous Games with Dynamic Logic. [Report]

PP-2007-25: Zhang, Jialong and Liu, Fenrong (2007) Some Thoughts on Mohist Logic. [Report]

PP-2007-01: Liu, Fenrong (2007) Diversity of Agents and their Interaction. [Report]

PP-2006-45: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2006) Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. [Report]

PP-2006-41: Liu, Fenrong (2006) Preference Change and Information Processing. [Report]

PP-2006-37: Liu, Fenrong (2006) Diversity of Agents. [Report]

PP-2006-38: de Jongh, Dick and Liu, Fenrong (2006) Optimality, Belief and Preference. [Report]

PP-2005-29: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2005) Dynamic Logic of Preference Upgrade. [Report]

MoL-2004-05: Liu, Fenrong (2004) Dynamic Variations: Update and Revision for Diverse Agents. [Report]

PP-2004-13: van Benthem, Johan and Liu, Fenrong (2004) Diversity of Logical Agents in Games. [Report]