MoL201209: Florio, Antonio (2012) Science in Axiomatic Perspective. [Report]

Text (Full Text)
MoL201209.text.pdf Download (709kB)  Preview 

Text (Abstract)
MoL201209.abstract.txt Download (2kB) 
Abstract
The axiomatic method counts two thousand and three hundred years circa. Suppes has proposed the category of EuclideanArchimedean tradition to refer to the axiomatic theories that have been developed before the inven tion/discovery of the nonEuclidean geometries. Among these theories the first axiomatic system that we know is Euclid’s Elements, a mathemat ical tractate consisting of thirteen books in which three centuries of Greek mathematical knowledge were given an order and were presented as a unified theory.1 Euclid produced another axiomatic theory, the Optics. This represents a theory of vision in Euclidean perspective rather than a tractate on physical optics. It is interesting that Archimedes’s Treatise, probably the first book on mathematical physics, is an axiomatic theory. The axiomatic method in the EuclideanAristotelian tradition was trans mitted during the medieval age and scholarship in history of science has established the use of the axiomatic method in scientific tractates through all periods from antiquity up to the sixteenth–seventeenthcentury Scientific Revolution. In the context of the Scientific Revolution an important ax iomatic theory is Newton’s Principia. The axiomatic method covers a too big period of history and philosophy of science and we cannot deal with it in this thesis. So we skip the analysis of the axiomatic method in the EucleanArchimedean tradition and begin our analysis in the nineteenth century when the axiomatic method entered in the modern phase. As Suppes puts it: “The historical source of the modern viewpoint toward the axiomatic method was the intense scrutiny of the foundations of geometry in the nineteenth century. Undoubtedly the most important driving force behind this effort was the discovery and development of nonEuclidean geometry at the beginning of the nineteenth century by Bolyai, Lobachevski, and Gauss.”.
Item Type:  Report 

Report Nr:  MoL201209 
Series Name:  Master of Logic Thesis (MoL) Series 
Year:  2012 
Uncontrolled Keywords:  Logic, Philosophy 
Depositing User:  Tanja Kassenaar 
Date Deposited:  12 Oct 2016 14:38 
Last Modified:  12 Oct 2016 14:38 
URI:  https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/875 
Actions (login required)
View Item 