MoL-2001-07: Rodenhäuser, Ben (2001) Updating Epistemic Uncertainty: an essay in the logic of information change. [Report]
Text (Full Text (PS))
MoL-2001-07.text.ps.gz Download (391kB) |
|
Preview |
Text (Full Text (PDF))
MoL-2001-07.text.pdf Download (427kB) | Preview |
Text (Abstract)
MoL-2001-07.abstract.txt Download (3kB) |
Abstract
The results of this thesis may be summarized as follows. In chapter 2,
we have introduced and motivated a general framework for analyzing
informational update, given by the concept of an update frame; the
main topic of this thesis was the comparison of this setting with what
seems to be the most general proposal for solving the update problem:
the operation of product update, introduced in the work of Baltag,
Solecki, and Moss. We stressed the differences between the two
settings: update frames are not tied to a specific rule of updating,
while the product update provides just that. But even when restricting
the class of update frames to those that obey such a rule, the basic
perspective is different: update frames provide a bird's eye view on
streams of epistemic interaction, while the product operation locally
performs updates in a specific situation. Section 2.4 compared the two
settings, product update, and update frames, focussing on the
interplay between the local and the global level. The main result was
a characterization of the relationship between product update and
update frames that applies to several interesting classes of update
frames. On the way, several features of the product update operation
became clear: first and foremost, it encodes a notion of - what we
called - epistemic height, that we recovered in the setting of update
frames. Also, it became clear how the product update operation
generates a stream of information flow in an algorithmic manner.
The next chapter introduced the language L_{BMS} of [BMS99], and the
extension L^*_{BMS} . The main feature of this semantics we stressed
is that it builds the product update operation right into the
interpretation of the language. Chapter 4 introduced a new language,
L_{EDA}, drawing upon the insights of Baltag et al. , but also using
tools known from the literature on dynamic arrow logic and hybrid
logic. Its main novelty is the use of epistemic operators both on the
level of states and on the level of actions. Additional operators
enable the study of preconditions and postconditions.
Chapter 5 was devoted to comparing the two approaches. We showed how
to characterize the operation of product update using the system
L_{EDA}. A comparison of the structural notions of bisimulations for
the two languages shed light on the circumstances in which dynamic and
epistemic bisimulation ``collapse'', in that they mutually imply each
other. We then showed how to simulate L^*_{BMS} , the extension of L
BMS with common knowledge operators, using L^*_{EDA} , which itself is
obtained by extending L_{EDA} with common knowledge/learning operators
both on states and actions.
Chapter 6 dealt with the closure and preservation problems raised by
the product update operation. We analyzed them using the basic
multi-modal language L_{ML}, which is a sublanguage of both systems
discussed in the preceding chapters of this thesis. We established
some results concerning the purely semantic side of the enterprize,
closure under update. Linguistically, we presented a preservation
result for first-order logic, and a fine structure analysis of
preservation questions for modal logic on models.
Item Type: | Report |
---|---|
Report Nr: | MoL-2001-07 |
Series Name: | Master of Logic Thesis (MoL) Series |
Year: | 2001 |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2016 14:38 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2016 14:38 |
URI: | https://eprints.illc.uva.nl/id/eprint/720 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |